
Date and time:9:00 - 10:00, Tuesday, November 7, 2006
Location:10th Floor Conference Room, DAIICHI SANKYO Head Offices
A1. We are considering directions on expansion of infrastructure and products acquisition. With regard to CS-747, in Europe, this is commercialized jointly with Lilly.
A2. We will consider a mid-term management plan upon consideration of policies going forward on Benicar (US bland name, generic name: Olmesartan).
A3.The FDA has its thinking concerning clinical trials, and the results of the carcinogenicity trials will be learned in the coming spring, so we will review the development plan upon consideration to those results.
A4. You may find we are slightly conservative.
A5.Demand for new prescription is slow, however, the ARB market is growing, and there is no change to the fact that we are still looking to become No 2 in ARB. However, the position in terms of sales on CS-8663, there are some slight differences when compared to Benicar.
A6.We discussed phase 2a data with the FDA, and as a result of the validation of safety and efficacy by trials on terminal treatment, it was determined that a clear superiority to existing products was not indicated, and the development was ended.
A7.That will not happen. In the discussions with the person charged with research and development, we are deciding to set up a disease level that we should place more focus on than on the field. Diabetes is also covered in the discussions.
A8. We are considering how to transition smoothly and how to minimize such impact. However, given the integration of the logistics center of Sankyo with the logistics center of Daiichi Pharmaceutical, the final shipment date of end of March may be sped up.
A9. We expect a loss of 31 billion yen in total. This would be more loss than initially planned, however, this is due to having not posted the integration related expenses of ZEPHARMA and DAIICHI SANKYO HEALTHCARE, and due to an increase in system integration expense over the original plan.
A10.Because we are calling for early retirement from December 4th, it is not appropriate to discuss this point now.
A11.We understand that there is no difference in the effects of any product. Drugs such as this that is administered for long periods have issues of safety, particularly toxicity. With regard to DU-176b, through various safety trials, we are confident about the safety to the liver at the present time. We however are moving forward the development by taking careful actions on aspects of safety.
A12.This drug is ghrelin, and has an effect to promote appetite. We wish to consider cahexia in the future.
A13.We will sell this at Daiichi Sankyo Inc, which is our US subsidiary. However, the kind of strategy is still under review. A number of firms including the majors have indicated an interest.
A14.At Daiichi Sankyo Group, we have positioned the mid-term management plan as a 3-year plan. It is positioned to be first 3 years out of long-term vision.
As a result of CS-747, we may need to review some scenarios. Expiration of the levofloxacin patent in the US will not be reflected in the mid-term 3 years management plan that we are currently considering.
A15.The precise mechanism is still unclear at present, that is, whether the mechanism is insulin-like.